Originally Posted by
nanok
yeah, exactly: it's been used for ever (in different materials though, very different), it works fine... for most hangers, except if it's ultralight webbing, etc. there's too many variables and disclaimers, and the "data" we have from field testing in 2 inch manila rope over the centuries should be regarded with some skepticism when extrapolating to 3mm dyneema dental floss and webbing that wheighs less per foot than some shoelaces of that same era.i'm not saying the becket hitch is bankrupt, i'm just saying i would not recommend it to anyone, meaning "if you have to ask, then no, use something else", if you know what you're doing and have the understanding as to when it's expected to work and how, then fine, but i'm at the point where i would rather not give it to a beginner as the first method to learn (and that makes me sad). and yes, i do hold the unpopular opinion that hammock manufacturers (or is it outfitters these days) should test webbing that they sell for suspension in the intended configuration, and state the configuration tested and the failure mode and load where it fails. just passing on the manufacturer provided MBS of the webbing won't do (or it shouldn't). all suspension components imho should come with their own tested MBS, in the intended configuration, i honestly think it is not too much to ask. but that's a different rant
for myself, i would not use it in a "new" material or some material i find "suspicious", without the ability to do proper load testing first (not just body weight).
the lapp hitch (bend?) is interesting, i first found out about it here on the forums actually, i didn't get the chance to play with it yet, but it looks intriguing, thanks for reminding me about it.
Bookmarks