Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Senior Member cmoulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Ossining, NY
    Hammock
    DH Darien, SLD Tree Runner
    Tarp
    HG hex
    Insulation
    Timmermade, Revolt
    Suspension
    Kevlar, Lapp Hitch
    Posts
    4,912
    Images
    356
    What is a paracord version of a soft shackle?
    Five Basic Principles of Going Lighter (not me... the great Cam Honan of OZ)
    “If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” ~ Gen. George S Patton

  2. #22
    cougarmeat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Hammock
    WBBB, WBRR, WL LiteOwl
    Tarp
    OES, WL BullFro
    Insulation
    HG UQ, TQ, WB UQ
    Suspension
    Python Straps
    Posts
    3,751
    Q: What is a paracord version of a soft shackle?
    A: A rubberband.

    In order to see what few have seen, you must go where few have gone. And DO what few have done.

  3. #23
    Senior Member cmoulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Ossining, NY
    Hammock
    DH Darien, SLD Tree Runner
    Tarp
    HG hex
    Insulation
    Timmermade, Revolt
    Suspension
    Kevlar, Lapp Hitch
    Posts
    4,912
    Images
    356
    Lol, I'm thinking maybe paracord 'alternative' because of the big construction difference vs Amsteel, i.e. core and no core.

    Also, there's paracord and then there's the real thing, mil-spec paracord. I wonder if the fanciful, brightly colored paracord sold for arts and crafts and boy scout projects — or the generic stuff sold to bushcrafters — is really rated at 550lbs.

    When in doubt, there's an easy solution... just make more wraps and double-triple-whatever material is available. I once used Zing-it to make an extension around a really big tree. Made about 5 wraps, tied it off and didn't worry one bit about it being strong enough. Heck, with enough wraps you could use polyester sewing thread. Hey wait, isn't that what they use for bar tacking to make webbing loops??
    Five Basic Principles of Going Lighter (not me... the great Cam Honan of OZ)
    “If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” ~ Gen. George S Patton

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    old dirt
    Posts
    442
    construction: well, we were talking about the "tie whatever knot you fancy" dyneema soft shackle, that's the context where paracord was mentioned as an example of why not to do that. there was a pic and some talk of a double overhand stopper and a fixed capture loop. so, the spliceability etc is kind of irrelevant for this context: take a length of paracord, fold it in half, tie a double overhand stopper with the ends, tie a simple overhand maybe toward the fold, to make some sort of capture loop, and you're done. "5 second soft shackle" *

    (*) a pointless 5 second softshackle if you ask me, i don't know why anybody would do this, but clearly people do, so might as well make it from paracord, instead of wasting perfectly good dyneema to make a deceivingly weak softshackle.

    mil spec vs "tie your own coffee cup"-spec: my guess would be, from what i have seen so far, they are, likely, mostly about that strong, but i expect most of them are not rated at all. (nobody bothered). they are probably about that strong because they use materials and manufacturing processes which are already very well established, so blindly copying the design of "mil-spec" paracord will very likely result in similar strength, even if nobody cares. now, if you care about the strength, for some particular reason, then "probably" is not good enough, so either get rated materials, or do your own break testing. but for general utility use, i wouldn't worry too much. if you're going to rappel on it, of course, then, well, you shouldn't (you might die. regardless of mil spec or not)

  5. #25
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Sierra Nevadas, CA
    Hammock
    MYOG RBTR kit
    Tarp
    MYOG RBTR Hex12 UL
    Suspension
    Meyerstech whoopie
    Posts
    2
    mil-spec = lowest bidder.

    I was in the Army for 9 years, mil-spec is synonymous with garbage. Civilian gear/tech is light years ahead of the military.

    Also, "mil-spec" is a commonly used marketing ploy as there is no one to prove/disprove whether a product is in fact "mil-spec".

  6. #26
    Senior Member cmoulder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Ossining, NY
    Hammock
    DH Darien, SLD Tree Runner
    Tarp
    HG hex
    Insulation
    Timmermade, Revolt
    Suspension
    Kevlar, Lapp Hitch
    Posts
    4,912
    Images
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by Kenna2016 View Post
    mil-spec = lowest bidder.

    I was in the Army for 9 years, mil-spec is synonymous with garbage. Civilian gear/tech is light years ahead of the military.

    Also, "mil-spec" is a commonly used marketing ploy as there is no one to prove/disprove whether a product is in fact "mil-spec".
    Then things have gone downhill. Some 30 years ago my brother in law was a C-130 loadmaster and I was occasionally the recipient of some military castaways and that was some good stuff then.

    Mil-spec hardware from McMaster-Carr is definitely better stuff.
    Five Basic Principles of Going Lighter (not me... the great Cam Honan of OZ)
    “If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.” ~ Gen. George S Patton

  7. #27
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Sierra Nevadas, CA
    Hammock
    MYOG RBTR kit
    Tarp
    MYOG RBTR Hex12 UL
    Suspension
    Meyerstech whoopie
    Posts
    2
    Likely the same stuff used now as was used then... The procurement and testing procedures that the military uses ensures that by the time anything hits circulation to regular units it's outdated by a few years. When the Army started issuing the DAGR GPS to replace the PLGR around 2006 it was already far eclipsed by civilian GPS units. As far as I know (I got out for good in 2017) the Army is still using the DAGR (early 2000s tech).

    Anyone can claim something is "mil-spec" as there is no real way to prove or disprove the claim, specifically for paracord as was the example above my post. I've seen many products labeled as "mil-spec" that I never saw during my time in the Army. After using Amsteel whoopie slings I would prefer Amsteel over true "mil-spec" paracord any day.

  • + New Posts
  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

    Similar Threads

    1. UQ construction idea
      By raftingtigger in forum Do-It-Yourself (DIY)
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 08-27-2015, 19:21
    2. synthetic construction
      By jonas winslo in forum Do-It-Yourself (DIY)
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 12-05-2013, 13:16
    3. DIY Hammock Under Construction
      By Meteor in forum Do-It-Yourself (DIY)
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 05-04-2011, 01:41
    4. amsteel construction?
      By the_gr8t_waldo in forum Suspension Systems, Ridgelines, & Bug Nets
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 04-15-2011, 22:03
    5. UQ DIY Suspension/Construction ???
      By SamuelJD in forum Bottom Insulation
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: 12-22-2010, 08:43

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •