Pretty much what he said. I imagine it is debatable for most as to whether a pad in a bridge is actually superior to an UQ, but for me there is no debate that with a bridge- or I'm sure a 90º hammock- a pad is an entire new world. It is at least still in the quite comfy range- to the point I may not even know a CCF pad is there, except for warmth of course. And with some solid advantages- never again a question about if it is snug enough vs too snug and or drafts/gaps. And if a perfect adjustment might change if you move during the night. Waterproof. Windproof. Ground. CCF = cheap.
But of course, Diamond64 has neither a bridge or 90º, but a Clark. I generally have not had great luck with pads in non-bridge, although I did have 1 good 18º night many years ago stacking pads in a Speer segmented pad extender(SPE) and a Speer hammock. Memory is starting to fade on that now, but I know I was very warm, and I don't recall being uncomfortable, though maybe not quite as comfy as usual. But so warm I know I could have gone a lot lower.
But like all have said: try that pad! You never know!
Bookmarks