Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    dakotaross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chamblee, GA
    Hammock
    SuperiorGear or Dutch netless
    Tarp
    custom pentagon
    Insulation
    down hammock or UQ
    Suspension
    Dutch Mantis
    Posts
    3,083
    Images
    19
    Seems to me its more of a coverage issue, rather than whether the UQ affects the lay, no? Semantics? I guess you can alter your lay to get the most coverage per your specific UQ, but seems to me given the various lengths that people use, this is a personal coverage preference not a lay issue primarily.
    "I wonder if anyone else has an ear so tuned and sharpened as I have, to detect the music, not of the spheres, but of earth, subtleties of major and minor chord that the wind strikes upon the tree branches. Have you ever heard the earth breathe... ?"
    - Kate Chopin

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    central texas
    Hammock
    ridgerunner
    Tarp
    superfly
    Suspension
    buckles
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by markr6 View Post
    People assume a 44" wide X 78" long UQ will support a person taller than 78" due to the angle. On paper, sure, that's 89.55" (Pythagorean Theorem), but in real life I'm saying it just doesn't work like that. There are more variables involved. If you want full coverage, you're going to need a little breathing room to be safe.

    I like to refer to my 72" Incubator. I'm 69" and it's just right. Those 3 "leftover" inches are good to have, and I'm certainly not getting a theoretical 84".
    I'm so glad you brought this up so that I do not purchase the incorrect size due to geometric assumptions..

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denmark/Sweden
    Hammock
    Dutch Half-wit Hexon 1.0
    Tarp
    Clark XL Tarp
    Insulation
    Wookie/UKH custom
    Suspension
    Dutch kit
    Posts
    323
    I felt that my old conventional UQ did limit my diagonal lay in my hammock. Since I got myself a wookie, I now get the exact same diagonal lay as I would without an underquilt. The Yeti I can't comment on.

    So for me, yes - The conventional UQ design does limit my diagonal lay in a hammock.

  4. #14
    Senior Member JmBoh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    PA
    Hammock
    Chameleon and a Ridge Runner
    Tarp
    UGQ WD 12'
    Insulation
    downy goodness
    Suspension
    cinch buckles
    Posts
    1,695
    Images
    3
    I have to adjust my quilt (HG incubators) a bit wonky to get good coverage on a diagonal lay without feeling the quilt against my feet. The head side I slide up farther toward the head of the hammock a few inches on the suspension and I move the foot side (right side for me) down toward the foot end a few inches then cinch it. I plan to sell my quilts and buy LL reapers this summer though. The custom length option he offers should allow me to get better coverage without feeling too tight in the foot end.
    “I am losing precious days. I am degenerating into a machine for making money. I am learning nothing in this trivial world of men. I must break away and get out into the mountains to learn the news”
    ― John Muir

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    130
    For full coverage, you need a quilt longer than you are tall. Forget trying to math the diagonal, it doesn't work.

    I am 72" tall, have a standard length (77" or 78"? I forget) Incubator. This is about the right length for me to have true head to toe full coverage.

    Don't try to go shorter unless you are intentionally choosing a less than full length quilt.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Rouskof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Paris, France
    Hammock
    GE ; RR ; Vertex ; Tentsile
    Tarp
    HG Cubens W/ doors
    Insulation
    Yeti, Wookis, Lynx
    Suspension
    dyneema strap/ring
    Posts
    840
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by markr6 View Post
    Good discussion here, but I was 100% mistaken on my original comment. It could have been how I worded it originally, so let's clear that up:

    What I was saying had to do with the length. People assume a 44" wide X 78" long UQ will support a person taller than 78" due to the angle. On paper, sure, that's 89.55" (Pythagorean Theorem), but in real life I'm saying it just doesn't work like that. There are more variables involved. If you want full coverage, you're going to need a little breathing room to be safe.

    I like to refer to my 72" Incubator. I'm 69" and it's just right. Those 3 "leftover" inches are good to have, and I'm certainly not getting a theoretical 84". So I have to stand by my BS statement in that regard.

    On topic with this thread: yes, I think any UQ allows for a diagonal lay...some just better than others.
    Thanks for claryfing. I had totally mistaken your post.

    Now auxilliary question : is the 6/8 UQ a good deal, or just silly complicate to save one ounce ? (my idea is that you would leave the head out and not the feet, don't know if it is feasible).

    This thread is funny, because everyone answers his own question.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,302
    Images
    3
    I have a 60x70 Costco quilt and feel I get "full coverage" with it. It's okay missing a bit at the top because I would have pillow of some sort anyway.

  8. #18
    Senior Member OneClick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    IN
    Hammock
    DIY 10.5' HyperD 1.6
    Tarp
    Warbonnet, SLD
    Insulation
    Hammock Gear
    Suspension
    WB Straps+Buckles
    Posts
    13,158
    Images
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Rouskof View Post

    Now auxilliary question : is the 6/8 UQ a good deal, or just silly complicate to save one ounce ? (my idea is that you would leave the head out and not the feet, don't know if it is feasible).
    I really like my 62" Phincubator. It leaves just my neck/head exposed...but not really since I use a clothes bag as a pillow. It's 30° rating is spot on too; good for the 35-40° temps I often find myself in.

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Charlottesville, va
    Posts
    56
    Would state that when setting up the UQ for a diagonal lay, do so first at hose with someone assisting. They can see what you cannot.

    Regarding dimensions, some assumptions might be assuming a fully flat lay. We all know our bottom sinks, which is a variable many do not account for.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by markr6 View Post
    I really like my 62" Phincubator. It leaves just my neck/head exposed...but not really since I use a clothes bag as a pillow. It's 30° rating is spot on too; good for the 35-40° temps I often find myself in.
    I'm a cold sleeper, I find true full length to be highly desirable for a winter bag. While a pillow or clothing under your head may suffice, nothing beats the feeling of radiant warmth you get from 3" of down.

  • + New Posts
  • Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Diagonal lay in a NX-250?
      By barchetta in forum Clark Jungle Hammocks
      Replies: 16
      Last Post: 11-03-2014, 22:34
    2. UQ and diagonal lie
      By nu2hike in forum Bottom Insulation
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: 11-08-2011, 19:27
    3. The Diagonal Lie
      By dvisic in forum General Hammock Talk
      Replies: 11
      Last Post: 10-24-2010, 15:26
    4. Diagonal or not
      By opie in forum General Hammock Talk
      Replies: 31
      Last Post: 01-13-2010, 01:57
    5. On the diagonal
      By campcrafter in forum General Hammock Talk
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 08-17-2008, 22:12

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •