Real good question. I googled the history and got some, but there is notably no mention of the bottom insulation issue - except on Wikipedia and it looks like a modern day reference. With animal skins being the first materials used in the "bag" design, my guess is that they offered a barrier between body and earth (dirt, snow, etc.) and that the skins necessitated a shape that was not conducive to the standard rectangular blanket used on a regular bed. There would be no excess to "tuck" like we commonly do now with quilts on the ground, so it was sewn to keep out drafts. My guess is that from there, the bag design became accepted and was used in the same form with different materials as time marched on.
I presume in milder climates that no pad was used and probably wasn't for some time. So, having at least some material between you and the dirt was of some benefit. As bags with insulation came about, they were probably warmer on bottom just due to the small amount of loft surrounding the body's pressure points. As pads became en vogue, it became mostly a non-issue as the pad provided the warmth - even if it was physical comfort that was the primary reason for having the pad.
I guess it took ultralight hikers thinking about what weight they could get rid of to produce the quilt as we know it for our use. But it probably wasn't until the relatively recent revolution of hammock camping that real discussions started happening on sleeping bags and how useless the insulation is on the bottom. Bags are a little more useful on the ground just because they get some loft in between pressure points. The hammock spreads out the body pressure points over a larger area, and thus crushes more insulation. It probably took that difference to spark the discussion, and the realization of the bottom insulation issue with bags, which obviously is still not so obvious.
Bookmarks