Originally Posted by
strikealight
Couple of thoughts in light of this latest tragedy.
First - hammock camping and hammocking in general seems to have exploded in popularity, particularly on your side of the pond. This means that there are increasingly huge numbers of folks hanging from increasingly huge numbers of trees, significantly increasing the probabilities of terrible freak accidents like these.
And I say "freak accidents" because as some posts in this very thread illustrate, sometimes it can be difficult to detect a suspect tree. Genuine example: I am inherently health and safety minded given I am involved in dealing with accident aftermaths in my working life, and I have two young sons. Last year I hung off a pair of trees after checking them carefully, looking at the bark up and down, pulling and pushing them this way and that, checking the twigs on them were alive, etc.. Woke in the middle of the night with my bum on the floor. One of the trees had started to break at ground level and the whole tree had been gradually leaning over. Leaning directly over ME. I immediately re-strung my whole set-up between two other trees in the dark. In the morning, I could see that much of the tree's thickness was rotten at and just below ground level - not something I would have specifically checked for. There was enough live wood to supply the tree to keep it looking healthy. It wasn't a massive tree - 8-10" or so (I compromised because the pitch afforded a great view of the city) and it seems the combination of the wind and the weight of my hang tipped the weakness over the edge. It was also a pretty wide any, which of course would have increased the lateral forces. I thought I knew what I was doing and was immune to accidents like this. My eldest son and I revisited the site just a few weeks ago while we were out for a hang, and the entire tree was on the ground. A not massive but not insubstantial tree, which I or (shudder) one of my sons could have ended up under. It seems a significant proportion of these recent tragic hammocking tragedies involve trees which are rotten from the inside, but look okay on the outside. Quite a trap for all but the most educated and experienced hammocker. At least one of these accidents involved trees in back yards that the owners have lived alongside for years.
In light of all of this, might I suggest a "Rogue Tree Gallery" sticky or something like that where good folks can post their horror stories, near-misses and photos to build up an educational resource, not just for us "serious" hammockers but for others using hammocks more casually - the sort of folks who I guess might be in the most danger. This resource could highlight those quirky little traps that aren't immediately obvious, or may be confined to certain localities or species of tree. For example, where I am I have rejected enough seemingly healthy and strong silver birches upon close inspection to make me inclined to avoid them entirely as a species. Trees near the banks of spate rivers have withstood hundreds of floods and so in my experience they seem to be inherently strong. Similarly, trees at the edges of woods on mountainsides have to withstand batterings from the wind, and this seems to weed out the weaklings - I am a lot more careful in the middle of sheltered ancient oak woods, especially when it comes to widowmakers. The trunk of my rogue tree was one of three which appeared to be growing out of the same root stock, which I now suspect are more prone to this sort of ground-level rot.
There must be more than a thousand years of experience on this forum. I think it would be a really good thing to have such a sticky to steer a new Scout hammocker to or some such, just to make them aware of the range of dangers and traps and to quickly "get their eye in" so to speak. I think this kind of knowledge and experience is not of the order that you want to learn from your own mistakes.
Bookmarks